This girl got kicked out of her university's gym for having a great set of shoulder blades.

This girl got kicked out of her university's gym for having a great set of shoulder blades.
Advertising

If you’re working out at Washington and Lee University, you better familiarize yourself with their gym's strict dress code which desperately needs a 2016 update. On April 12, a student at the university named Danielle had her gym session abruptly ended because of the tank top she wore. 

According to TotalSororityMove.com (TSM), Danielle was asked to leave the gym by a student employee who told her that her “shirt was too low in the back.”

//cdn.someecards.com/posts/b5fdec3b2edb786d0dcde40ad211a830-UDmBaO.png
Apparently, revealing your shoulder blades is like flashing your boobs at this gym.

"I'm disappointed. I have witnessed nip slips in that very fitness center when meat heads have trimmed a few too many inches from the sides of their homemade tank tops," Danielle told TSM. "But I get kicked out for revealing a triangle in the middle of my back? And on Women's Equal Pay Day?" These squares can't handle the triangle on your back, Danielle. They. Just. Can't.

And yes, Washington and Lee's choice of exercise wear is definitely for squares. Taken from the university's website, here are their do's and don'ts regarding fitness attire:

Advertising

It's not like Danielle pulled a Kim K and wore something this racy to the gym.

🙏

A post shared by Kim Kardashian West (@kimkardashian) on

Danielle also mentioned that the employee who confronted her was a girl who was weirdly sent by the male director at the gym. Perhaps the dude didn't want to approach Danielle directly because that would just mean he was checking her out and was too threatened by the way her mid-back made him feel, right? Nooo, no dude ever wants a girl to know that.

Advertising

Also as she was leaving the gym, Danielle said she "bumped into a boy headed there who is known for his revealing tank tops. I wondered if he would be kicked out like I had been." Double standards, much W&L?

Advertising